Automatically translated from Basque, translation may contain errors. More information here. Elhuyarren itzultzaile automatikoaren logoa

Lithuania feared Chernobyl: Belarus sets up a new nuclear power plant at the border

  • Chernobyl has been one of the most viewed series of 2019, which narrates the tragedy of the Soviet Union in 1986, when it became one of the most viewed. Many scenes from the historical drama produced by the HBO and Sky chains ran in cities such as Ukraine or Belarus, but not in the capital of Lithuania.
Lituaniak leherketa nuklear baten simulakroa egin du, Belarusfeed atariak erakutsi moduan.
Lituaniak leherketa nuklear baten simulakroa egin du, Belarusfeed atariak erakutsi moduan.
Zarata mediatikoz beteriko garai nahasiotan, merkatu logiketatik urrun eta irakurleengandik gertu dagoen kazetaritza beharrezkoa dela uste baduzu, ARGIA bultzatzera animatu nahi zaitugu. Geroz eta gehiago gara, jarrai dezagun txikitik eragiten.

Irony is very common in history, and these streets have been visited in early October with images as vivid as those of Chernobyl, although very few in the world have seen them: Lithuania has simulated a nuclear explosion, concerned about the Astravyets nuclear power plant, which Belarus will launch with the new year, about 40 kilometres from Vilnius.

In September, the government announced that it would spend EUR 900,000 on the purchase of iodine pills for 2.8 million Lithuanians, one third of the country’s population. The head of the Civil Protection Agency, Edgaras Geda, advanced to the media the essence of the October maneuvers: “Everything you have seen in the Chernobyl series you will see in the streets here: sirens, rescuers, helicopters… Here people remember what happened in Chernobyl, many of our relatives, including my uncles, were taken to rescue work, so we know it so well. We will not wait for the next accident to happen, we have to be prepared for whatever happens.”

This is how we have seen – although the Basques have not taught us – the maneuvers that during the three days following October 1 have been starred by officials, volunteers and citizens of the area: sirens sounding alarm, emergency calls and messages on people’s phones, military personnel in evacuation work, volunteers who made victims suffering records and tests, agents dressed for nuclear emergencies by googling people, animals and food… The images can be found.

Simulating a nuclear accident in a town in Lithuania. (Photo: (Belarusfeed)

The Presidents of Lithuania and Latvia, who were visiting in those days, publicly expressed their agreement with the concerns raised by the Astravyets nuclear power plant. However, Latvia has not endorsed Lithuania’s decision to renounce the electricity coming from Belarus, the government has reported.

Lithuanian President Gitanas Nauseda said abroad that the power plant built by Belarus on the border is very dangerous for other countries in the region, that Astravyets does not meet safety standards, that since they began to be built in 2012 there have been several accidents, robberies, mistreatment of workers and others: it is certain that at least three workers have lost their lives and that the head thief of a plant has fallen 3 tonnes. Nor does it comply with the recommendation not to build nuclear power stations less than 100 km from the major cities from Fukushima. Lithuania has asked the European Union (EU) to press Belarus to move forward.

The Astravyets plant, which has to produce 2,400 megawatts with two atomic reactors, has been built by Russian Rosatom. The public company Rosatom has ongoing or ongoing projects, in addition to Russia, in countries such as China, India, Turkey, Hungary or Finland. Last August there was a traffic accident at the Nyonoksa military base, in which five soldiers lost their lives and five others were injured by radioactivity in an atomic missile under the supervision of Rosatom.

The Lithuanians have no reason to get angry with Belarus, seeing that they build Astravyets 40 kilometres from Vilnius, after they had renounced atomic energy in a referendum. Both countries were part of the great Soviet Union when Chernobyl broke out in 1986. Lithuania then functioned as a Ignalina power plant, similar to that of Chernobyl.
The European Union considered Ignalina to be too dangerous and was therefore closed in 2009. The authorities had previously called for a referendum to hear the public's opinion: the majority were in favour of the power stations continuing to operate, but since participation did not reach 50%, the government listened to the EU.

The government of Lithuania decided, together with those of Latvia and Estonia, to build a new one: Visaginas with a power of 1,350 MW. In 2012, the Parliament of Navarre (Seimas in Lithuanian) decided that the matter should be approved by the public and called for a referendum on 14 October. With a participation of 52.58%, the non-nuclear share was 64.77%, the yes share was 35.23%. What happened between the 2009 and 2012 referendum? It is a serious atomic accident in Fukushima in March 2011, which incidentally was to build the Japanese Visaginas Hitachi.

Belarus has to launch the new power plant in January 2020 and, although more guarantees have been negotiated, Lithuanians will have to learn to live with the atoms of Astravyets next to them. They won't be very comforted to know that they're not the only ones. The Austrian people, despite the legal and constitutional ban on building atomic power stations, are also condemned to see how new nuclear power stations are being built in Slovakia and Hungary where any accident can directly harm the Austrians.

Astravyets Central. Belarus has built the area against the border and is 40 kilometres from Vilnius, the capital of Lithuania.

Meanwhile, the people of Belarus, what does it say? We do not know, if we do not know that a nuclear emergency has been committed in Lithuania, a member of the European Union, it will be more difficult for us to get the echoes of the written media with cyrillic characters. The damn Chernobyl factory was about 5 kilometres from the border with Belarus. Seeing Belarus, which has paid more expensive than Ukraine for the consequences of the Chernobyl disaster, in its bid to play again with atomic energy in 2020, indicates something about its political and social system.

The Association of Non-Nuclear Pro-Belarusian Scientists has for some time been alerting the authorities about the risks of the Astravyets project and mobilizing itself according to its potential. One of the scientific leaders, Heorhi F. The old physicist Lepin went to the Polish television station Belsat last June. “I feel the need to remember Txernobil, to remind people,” he says in front of the camera. “There I saw a lot of things I have to tell the world.

It still tears my heart.”

In 1986, as a well-known scientist at the University, he left Chernobyl voluntarily. He worked for six years with the cracked reactor. He participated in the drafting group of the Chernobyl Victims Act. He has several books written on the subject. Lepin was surprised from the beginning of the location of the Astravyets plant, due to the seismic hazard of the area and the immediate proximity of the chosen site of a warehouse that houses the bacteriological Bacillus Anthracis (the bacteria of the black mound). 20 scientists publicly warned from the outset that this was the most inappropriate place to build such a power station.

 

Since 1994, the President of Belarus, Aliaksandr Lukaxenka, does not want much of Lepin and the scientists on his rope: “He says that those of us who are against nuclear are lazy scientists, because he cannot say that we are ignorant. He sees us as ‘disguised malefactors’ and people opposed to the nation. That’s what he said about me.”

Many other people who realise the danger of the issue are silent, and Lepin struggles from Belarus for his silence. In the video of the Belsat chain, the old physicist talks about the other wise men who do not move at the door of the Astravyets power station: “It’s clear: they don’t tell the truth. They say that nuclear has no risk, that it is cheap, that it brings benefits. That is how those who do not want to lose their small jobs speak. They're not going to say it because they live in fear of losing their jobs. But they are the ones who are not. It is the Abertzale that tells the truth for the good of the people, not for the good of some leaders.”


You are interested in the channel: Energia nuklearra
Microsoft reactivates Three Mile Island nuclear power plant to power artificial intelligence
In 1979, a nuclear accident occurred in one of the units of the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant in the US state of Pennsylvania. The other, which closed in 2019, will come back to work to meet Microsoft’s huge energy needs.

Nuclear power production at the historical top, are we sure?
According to the International Energy Agency, by 2025 more nuclear energy will be produced than ever in the world. We are faced with a new impetus for nuclear, but there is nothing more to do with the “events” that occur in reactors and power plants to become aware of the... [+]

The European Parliament calls for nuclear to be considered clean energy
Parliament adopted the agreement by an absolute majority on Tuesday 21: 456 in favour and 153 against. It therefore urges the European Commission to adopt in the European Emissions Free Industry Act nuclear energy is being prepared among the zero-emitting energies.

Some experts point out that the discharge of Fukushima water poses no significant risks
Radiation and nuclear safety experts point out that the radioactive water being poured from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant is not a significant threat either to marine living beings or to people. This has been pointed out in a study published in the journal Science.

Microsoft wants to use nuclear power to power artificial intelligence.
The cloud doesn't exist, it's someone else's computer. In particular, clouds are huge pavilions full of someone else's computers that need huge amounts of energy. Microsoft wants to invest in small nuclear reactors to meet these energy needs.

Fukushima: past accident, severe damage and solutions yet to be discovered
Inevitably, on 24 August, the waters of the Fukushima power plant have begun to be thrown into the sea, as 97 per cent of the contaminated water tanks are full and water is added without cutting, with 140 tonnes per day. Despite being "decontaminated" water, the population remains... [+]

2023-08-23 | Ilargi Manzanares
Polluted Fukushima waters begin to pour into the sea
The decision of the Japanese Government has sparked protests in the country and, among other things, China has criticised the decision. The consequences of the 2011 nuclear accident continue.

2023-08-01 | Ilargi Manzanares
The coup d'état in Niger endangers the interests of Europe and the US
Last Wednesday there was a coup in Niamey. General Abdourrahmane Tchiani leads the battered military group and the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) has given them a week to reinstate their former president, threatening the authorities to say they will use... [+]

2023-07-20 | Nicolas Goñi
Fusion of ice in the Arctic would also produce radioactive waste
Arctic ecosystems are particularly fragile, as due to their low temperatures the growth of all beings is slow and the recovery time after a disorder is long. However, arctic ecosystems have become dumping grounds for 20th century industrial activities, voluntarily abandoned by... [+]

Garoña will be shot down by the public company after 40 years of exploitation by Iberdrola and Endesa
The ownership of the facility has been entrusted to the public company Enresa of the Government of Spain, which has planned a total expenditure of EUR 475 million for demolition work. Araba Garoña Gabe denounces that the benefits of 40 years have been private and that the... [+]

The Spanish Government authorizes the demolition of Garoña
The Ministry of Ecological Transition and Demographic Challenge (MITECO) has authorized the demolition of the nuclear census. This has allowed the ownership of the facility to be left to the public company of Enresa.

High temperatures have forced the activity of nuclear plants near the Rhone River to be reduced.
Bugey plants in eastern France and Saint-Alban have reduced their electricity production, so the activity has concluded that the increase in water temperatures has caused damage to the ecosystem. In terms of time, the expected temperatures are high, so they have had to make the... [+]

2023-07-10 | Mikel Aramendi
Tritium diplomacy

The protest will gradually spread to the Pacific, in an operation that will be extended for several years from the following days, the waters contaminated by radiation accumulated during these twelve years (over one million cubic metres) at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power... [+]


Eguneraketa berriak daude