The authorities have read positively the data provided by the statistical services on the situation in Libya. Both unemployment, which has left behind the double-digit number, and economic growth, even though the trend is decreasing. The analysis of some of my colleagues by profession is similar, that we have left the crisis behind, that recruitment has increased, that employment can be achieved soon. In my opinion, however, the breakdown of the crisis in society is very large and serious.

A growing part of society is running out of basic social rights because of the Great Recession it has suffered over the past ten years. Reconciliation policies for working and family life include a reduction in working time, but because of changes in the labour market many workers are not guaranteed this right: a woman who links precarious temporary contracts knows that when applying for her right they will not renew a contract. If you have a child in your head, the risk of job loss is high.

Suppose that that woman wants to rent a home, because banks won't sell her a mortgage. It is becoming more and more frequent to ask for a guarantee and the price of housing on the free market has been increasing year after year. Precarious work, low wage and high temporality, do not facilitate the parents' departure.

The Basque Government wants the consumer to eat organic food and ethical clothing. But with these precarious jobs, you will only have at your disposal slaughterhouses or moths contaminated with pesticides; you will buy cheap clothing from a multinational that crushes Asian workers, because with your salary you will not be able to buy an ethics.

We often explain the environment from each other's reality. An example of this is to think that from a specific case we know it is generality, extrapolation fallacy. The colleagues I mentioned earlier do not see it because they explain reality from their standard of living. But I have seen similar trends from those in stable employment (often adults). They don't understand why the birth rate is so low, with the advances that are made in the law; they don't understand how many haven't left the parental home; they don't understand how they don't consume organics, just a little more expensive.

They do not understand that precariousness crosses all parts of life, preventing them from living a dignified life. That is why improving employment in this capitalist society is a necessary condition. If you're in stable employment, don't consider precariousness as a smallness.