The first initiative of globalization was developed under the hegemony of the British Empire, with the aim of dispersing the capitalist market without regulation around the world. This imperialist attempt had a multiple response from states, peoples and working classes. I. The World War opened the era of four decades of military conflict until this initiative was buried. Then there was the fall of the Berlin Wall and the second attempt at globalisation, led by the United States. Commodity and market conquests have necessitated political, economic and military interventions that sometimes violate international law.

Violence and chaos have become the main exponents of the second wave of capitalist globalization, and like the first, the answer has also reached the second. Regional powers have placed limits on globalisation and national projects have been directly attacked by citizens to defend the interests of the grass-roots classes. This resistance largely explains the desperate response of the West to the destabilization of the resistant and their geographical environments: promoting and protecting soft or hard state blows; arming opposition groups, pushing civil wars and turning them into proxy wars (delegated wars) against their enemies; finally, bombing countries and occupying them if necessary.

The consequences of destabilization policies have led to the destruction of countries, between the dead and the refugees. The cost of not weakening the internal intensity of the West has reinforced propaganda and political manipulation. First, the enemies against capitalist globalization are identified and then the campaign of demonization and stigmatization begins, manipulating reality. Most media and opinion makers are starting to throw away the trash of the enemies that the West has designated. The adjective “al Assad criminal regime” comes in series and then they use the “Obama administration” on the same day as the United States. United States He bombed a Doctors Without Borders hospital in Afghanistan and caused at least 30 deaths. No, the head of the editorial lines was not “Obama: here is the monster”, no, those things were reserved for Putin, due to the Russian President’s rejection of the coup in Ukraine.

The Ukrainian nationalists who burned and killed dozens of people in Odessa were not called a monster. The Petro Poroshenko regime has not been described as a criminal, even though the Ukrainian Army bombed Donbass civilians, the Ukrainian President initiated the war of conquest and publicly said: “Our children will go to schools and kindergartens, their children will sit in the basements because they do not serve at all.”

This year, Poroshenko indirectly admitted that there was a coup in Ukraine: It has formally requested the Constitutional Court to declare that the suspension of Víctor Yanukovich as charged in the Nóos case has been illegal. However, the media have done nothing but collide with that. Just as the opinion makers have not rectified the manipulated garbage they dumped on the Maidan massacre. It is clear that the snipers were part of the opposition that gave the coup d’état. Moreover, as responsible for this matter, the Ukrainian State has launched a judicial persecution against ex-Members of the ultra-right Svoboda party. But nobody talks about that, as few people talk about the dozens of incendiary attacks on refugees that are taking place throughout Sweden.