If I had said, Simon of Paris, that women are not born women!

We read in the book Sciences de la vie et de la terre (merci, Nancy Huston) of the first order of the Liceo: “We are not born men or women; it is the option of each, of being one or being another.”

And someone said on the radio: “Sex is personal. There are no two sexes in the human species.”

Not two sexes? “I say to him.” Males and females: only two, who predispose us to our behavior; of course, society or each can adapt those provisions: our sexual identities are very elaborate.

“Stop them! Everything is made! Everything is explained by gender!”

It's interesting to distinguish between sex and gender. The gender nuances, hobbies, increases, enjoys the sexual difference.

Of the sexual differences: men sometimes have stomach pain, we cannot squander – women seem to live differently –.

Beyond: basic sexual differences may result in few women playing road pawns, or in the majority of prisoners being men – in those areas and no one defends parity.

Also, basic sexual differences (basic, but necessary!). The consequence is that most boys preferred guns in their diversions and most girls preferred dolls.

It is fair that our children want to grow on an equal footing. It's unfair, on the other hand, to want to grow in the indifference of biology, which yet could grow in the difference between equals.

In the face of equality, it's not difference, it's inequality. Equality does not deny differences; it means injustice to justice, to wages or to treatment.

I will be eclipsed, but behind the gaze of a man following a woman’s butt (barrabil, prostate, zakil) I see a sexual apparatus, and behind the desire to be the beauty of a woman, I see a uterus – the desire to look beautiful is not a consequence of millennial sexism; sexism, cinema or cosmetic advertising blows, blurs, blurs, degrades.

We try to distinguish between sex and gender, so we can try to distinguish between the desire to look beautiful innate: what a woman's brain can express and what has been established: what action against a woman's hair and wrinkles can mean.

We are a society that hides sexual differences and which, in turn, increases madly thanks to the beauty and pornography industries.

Our
grandmother's doll: the one that made her father, rag, good friend to him, or boy, or what our mom wanted him to be.

Since then, two kinds of dolls: the one that ignites in the child the “maternal instinct”, one, and Barbie, the other, the “instinct of seduction”. Both are, after all, alienating. Like anything else, the West has chosen the second; in its life cycle, it has chosen an era as a model of the Panpinist older girls: the woman, who, being beautiful and desirable, is not yet a mother.

Beautiful and appetizing: particularity to the eyes of men.

You can see a woman sacrificing herself to the eyes of men, behind each of the nieces.

A woman who pleases to the desires of men, behind every whore.
What about the looks of women? Their desires to be, to be together, to do things -- they don't appear, much less, in the debates about equality or desires.

If the status of women is undervalued and, regardless of who performs them, household tasks, including child care, while they are despised ... it is not worth talking about equality.

We need different views of women, especially men.

“Until there is equality, there will be mistreatment.” Equality: What do you mean? A fairer treatment? Do men more in household chores (there doesn't seem to be anyone's preferences) and women more in external chores (yes, the priority of many)?

I understand that: “As long as there are males and females, there will be mistreatment.” The minister has made a proud assessment: “In these ten years (since the law on gender-based violence was enacted in Spain) more than one million men have been prosecuted for ill-treatment.”

I understand that: “Men mistreat.” Mistreatment is linked to the status of man, a mistake which fortunately will correct the state.

I do not deny (moreover, nobody makes it clear) that the violence of men may be linked to biology, but: Doesn't it have anything to do with what's happening in society? With child abuse?–abuse: blows, etc., as well as neglect: abandoned children in schools, screens, nowhere; children growing up in one way or another...–

For what to ask, we already have the solution: jail.

The
idea of equality is not the idea of natural people, proclaimed by the rich Westerners long ago that the poor, the women -- they look at the cry of those men. The idea of equality has created new conflicts between the sexes.

In Euskera, we could differentiate it: equality (home: equality in difference) and inequality (desire to be “equal to rich men”).

Parity has come down the road of equality: a mechanism created by the institutions to solve a possible problem, so that some women have a place in the centres of power.

* Article submitted to the Editor by Pablo Sastre.