The central government of Spain is telling us, time and again, that it has to do what it does not want. That reality makes him change his electoral program. As we can see, when he did the program, he didn't know the reality, or he lied to us in the pre-election campaign. One of the two.

Later, in order to cover up what he really wanted to do in the budget, he waited for the Andalusian elections to pass and then there were sharp cuts in social spending. But it made us believe that those cutbacks to keep the appearance would reach all ministries.

Budget cuts are now being taken for next year, but we will not know anything until the elections in Galicia and the Basque Autonomous Community have passed. Then you will have your hands free to do whatever you want. So, when it comes to voting, pay attention!

However, not everything is a reduction. In fact, the Ministry of Defence is not going to suffer negative consequences. To pretend, there was an 8.8 per cent reduction in the Ministry’s expenditure for 2012. But as criticism of the cuts has been weakened, the Defence appropriations have risen by 28.21%. In addition, the amount committed for the coming years amounts to 27 billion, excellent to meet the additional expenses required by the Bologna university model. But Raxoy's government prefers expensive private universities to private universities, to general universities.

What will the additional military expenditure be used for? Purchase of 87 combat aircraft, helicopters, howitzers, Leopard cars and boats for the Navy, etc. What was missing from Spain! But Spain still dreams in its times of imperialism, as if the centuries had not passed. In my humble opinion, to defend the island of Perejil and so many other precious stones, similar expenses are not justified, let alone to participate fully in an adventure such as that of Afghanistan, from which international invaders will never go well.

These military expenditures have not been challenged by the EU. Greece's military expenditure, financed by the large banks of Germany and France, is well received by the governments of Merkel and France. Nor do they criticise Spanish women, but they do criticise expenditure on pensions, health, education and other social expenditure.

For the 1960s, in the URL0. The strength of the political-industrial complex was recognized, which explained the enormous military expenditures. Well, among us too, the lobbying force of this complex is evident. These expenses will cover the lobbies mentioned, not the needs of all citizens. In addition, additional purchases from the Ministry of Defence will take advantage, above all, of the companies in Germany and Great Britain, and less of them here.

Military expenditure will rise, but in the meantime R & D investments will be reduced. With lower costs that can cope with the crisis, the possibilities of researchers or skilled workers in the country will be reduced. In fact, in 2012 these R & D expenditures were reduced by 25.5% compared to 2011 and by 35% compared to 2009, more than a third. Where are we going? Where will we employ our young people? Where are the students who will educate us with our taxes going to go?

We see again and again the EU’s dual behaviour when we compare military spending with social spending. The first will not question those that will be used to meet the first needs of citizens. Faced with the enormous expenses of the political-industrial complex, he will look elsewhere, while he will not stop at the cut in expenses to guarantee pension, education and universal health.

Is this the great well-being that the EU brought us?