(...)

Lately we are engaged in extensive dialogue with many agents, companies, church spaces... and we are all asked, “But does this [the process that has begun in Aiete] not turn back?

I don't ask him, because it seems to be a mistake...

I will answer you: unilaterality is the main guarantee of this situation. Why? Because no one has been treated here, because we want that to be decided and that to be the case.

The Abertzale left has stated that it "does not share" Lanbide's attack on the Attorney's office. “It opposes the build-up of forces,” they said. For some it may be a weak argument.

I am not going to go into the evaluations of those who do them, they have decided to do so, they are acting on their own, so they and nobody else are working on it with all the consequences. It's over. Among the decisions taken by the Abertzale left in Zutik Euskal Herria, he said that he wants to develop this new time on a political road and in peace, that is one of the characteristics of this new time, therefore, the opposite behaviors are not part of the Abertzale left's wager. Everyone will have their opinion about what they've done, but it's clear that the Abertzale left is not in that, and if someone wants to go around -- on their own and at risk.

If a kind of social revolution were to occur, those behind those actions would be enemies.

That's making hypotheses, right? If this situation were to occur, it would be a new context, not only for the Abertzale left, but for the whole world, and everyone would have to put it on that new stage. I do not know if fortunately or unfortunately, but I see that situation very far away, at least now I do not see it. For us these actions are behaviors of the past, which the Abertzale left has decided are not useful in this political text. In addition to the personal opinion that can generate me, if someone has decided that he has to do so, he knows what he is doing and will have to respond on his behalf.