Moreover, it will have to bring together other members so that, through the accumulation of forces, they act effectively from the left in the Basque political sphere, along the same road for Euskal Herria to be a political subject. Another question is how to reconcile the common activity of the coalition members with that which it is not, since, in the end, in addition to the minimal essence that the fundamental axes need, there are also other issues.

Ideological deepening is therefore more essential than ever, because it is not something that can be left for later. I mean, what it's like to be left today and here, in very different times of crisis. It is time to move from small and large words to small words. Rethink, update, create messages. Moreover, this deepening derives the roadmap of changes, weighed in space and time, the credibility that an effective socio-political movement needs in order to materialize. I am referring to the social perception, which is an indispensable political factor, of permanence in the institutions, although not sufficient. In addition, this perception cannot be limited to the social sphere of Bildu, it must be extended beyond, in the good path of betting. Bildu has come to bring about change, and that is more than opening the doors of the institutions and encouraging citizen participation; concrete proposals are needed, drawn up, above all, to take steps on the road to change.

But, of course, consensus also conditions the roadmap. This is the call for general elections. From the Left, in a broad sense, I see the cooperation of the sovereign forces as necessary, as here too. But I expose my doubts as I become an Abertzale alliance, because I cannot separate that of the political subject from that of the social model. Bone and pulp. There are also doubts about the action in local institutions, besides betting on the political subject, so that we do not get involved in marasma. I would therefore very much appreciate the debate on this subject, as we are at the time of clarification.

Condition contexts, yes. They cannot avoid what they bring, even if they bring in a very interested and distorted manner issues that are by themselves serious. That of the victims, the victor and the loser, is the false milestone they want to set in the way of the unilateral reading of the past. Trap, but it's there. On the way to what the Gernika Agreement says, steps must be taken, albeit unilaterally, by adding a small letter to the large letter, a sign of a serious prospect of a renewed political position. From time to time it will be a shared reading of the past; by then, a shared reading of what it is today, on the road to the future, will also be necessary. All readings, at least in the larger traces, the shared ones; in the jellyfish the own. But the social perception to reach it is fundamental. In that political direction, time does not have the same value as in geology; let it be taken into account before some become fossils.