Most of it is designed for the visitor to return, starting with the temporary exhibition. More than eleven hours of recordings made to people from many parts of the world: answers to their questions about life, happiness, crying. It's worth listening to the answers and seeing those humans.

Diverse information about our ethnography, history, painting in permanent exhibitions. I’m going to focus not on the fillings but on the gaps and wrong views. Starting with the shortcomings, the literature of the beginning of the 20th century is, in my opinion, properly referred to under the denomination “Vasco-Spanish literature”, Unamuno, Baroja, Maeztu, and under the denomination of Basque literature: I'm talking about E. Assisted by Arrese, M. The field and T. I'm talking about Alciaga. Guess which is missing: According to D. I'm talking about Aguirre. His Crestal, and let’s not say Garoa, are not to be excluded in this section.

According to the mistaken view, referring to some important periods and events in our history, what should be objective information is a key word that leads to manipulation: radical, radical nationalism.

It is said that under the dictatorship of Primo de Rivera Basque nationalism was supported in culture, as we are expressly told. It is said that the general banned radical nationalism and tolerated the moderate. Through this key distinction of nouns, the unaware reader is told: He banned the union and tolerated the PNV. The text suggests, by the way, that the General’s strict dictatorship was tolerated by the dictablanda, somewhere there. Remember that Basque nationalism did not practice armed struggle at the time, but suffered repression.

Coming to the birth of ETA, we read that in the 50’s there was a rupture between the nationalists in exile and the interns. The truth of it. And in the 60’s came radicalisation – the key word – and in 1968, ETA carried out its first attacks. There is no mention of the terrible repression here either. There is no mention of the importance of the wars of decolonization, especially those of Algeria, Cuba, or May 68, the importance of the different culture that emerged in Europe during the post-war period in the creation of ETA; there is no mention of the fact that the initial was not an attack, but a malicious conspiracy, and that the first assassin was killed immediately afterwards, in a similar way.

It is enough to manipulate the radical name to give a manipulated ideologized vision, guided by the current political correctness, not a balanced contrasted historical perspective.