Recent polls have caused panic within the UPN. When they broke up with the People’s Party, most thought they would make a huge difference to Raxoi’s party, but it is said that at the same time of the economic crisis the PP has eaten the difference to the UPN, to the point that it appears almost the same. However, Barcina, at least apparently, is calm and knows that if it is not by the hand of Cervera of the PP, she will sit in the palace of the Diputación accompanied by Roberto Jiménez of the PSN. These days, with fear and surprise on his face, many of his comrades are asking Sanz the same question; why have we helped Zapatero? How long will we be Zapatero’s salvation, and how long will we be ashamed of ourselves? In the answer, the word “Spain” comes from the lips of the corellar; that they have not voted for Zapatero, but for Spain, in the hope that if Spain hits the river, Navarre will also.

(The To! The favourite myth of right-wing Navarrese is over: that even if the world collapsed, Navarre would go ahead of all the disasters).

But it is clear that the UPN in Madrid, as well as the PSN in Navarre, plays in supporting Sanz himself. But there are other reasons behind the behavior of the UPN: on the one hand, the unparalleled support given to the Caja de Navarra for its expansion in the Peninsula by order of Zapatero; and, on the other hand, that, contrary to what could be imagined, in the surveys NaBai has not retreated, but tends to consolidate, and this is what makes the head of the Navarrese government particularly nervous. Therefore, Sanz says that it is necessary to get along with the socialists so that they are not tempted to deal with the coalition. But even if it were tempting, the state motive would probably appear again, as it did in the summer of three years ago.

In fact, after Franco’s death, the regime in force in Navarre is a consequence of the State’s motive, not forgetting, of course, that ETA also set its own stone. The possibility of breaking the balance of the regime came from Navarra Bai. But we can’t know if there will be such a possibility again: the nuance of the nuances, the fact that all the parties in the coalition say yes, that NaBai will be present in the votes, but it is precisely the nuances that we must pay attention to. Meanwhile, the Patriotic Left is putting forward its proposal and has clearly indicated who it wants to accompany (among other things, the grassroots militancy of Aralar and EA) and who it does not (Batzarre and PNV). He is also working with the Basque Government to set up a new initiative in Navarre if he has not already done so. The fact is that if anyone is NaBaizalea, they are Navarrese militants of EA, who are very satisfied in the coalition, and anyone who knows Navarre knows that most Navarrese voters of EA will hardly go hand in hand with the people of the Union. In view of this, the Urizar and the Navarrese party leaders, including the former president Garaikoetxea, are making a great effort to convince the party members and to prepare a favorable environment for the Sovereign Axis, while not all will be convinced, which is a source of concern for the party leaders.

Now, therefore, it remains to be seen that, in addition to the Spanish right-wing (UPN, PP) and the Spanish left-wing (PSN, IU), who and what structure (one or several) will be presented in the votes of the year that has come in the framework of the patriots and dialects of Navarre. In other words, it remains to be seen whether the NaBai parties, amid so much controversy, will be able to ratify the proposal that gave rise to that 2007 opportunity. The time will tell.