When the CIA director is interviewed in one of the most prestigious prime time programs on Saturday afternoon, something is happening when CIA directors are not to broadcast television interviews. Much less about their work.

Endemic, when the President of the United States (US), the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense, during the week, are able to provide military support to Russia for the war in Ukraine, once there are hearings, it must be concluded that what is going on is quite serious.

However, anyone who goes to the content of the statements of the four in search of information, rather than clarity, will find confusion. Four heads, four heads. One (Blinken) says that China has almost certainly already brought "dual-use resources" to Russia, because, of course, without any evidence, the true faithful do not need it. The other (Biden) says that China does not expect arms to reach Russia, but that if so it would have consequences; otherwise, when the flight of butterflies also has consequences. The third (Austin), on the other hand, says that they have no indication of any of this, but that in any case it would not be a good idea, it is not bad, listening by mouth to what would have more to do.

But undoubtedly, the brand adds to what the fourth (Burns) said: the CIA knows that "Chinese leadership is reflecting on the transmission of lethal teams to [Russia]." That is true, the senior officials have not yet taken a decision. This remake of Colin Powell's jar has been called "intelligence" by believers, and the faithful interviewer does not ask if the CIA has remade those who lost five or six years ago.

Those of us who are only seriously curious to know the intentions of the Beijing authorities through the public reading of what they say, may suspect that the counter-programming of the 12-point project that China has launched to curb the war in Ukraine is the key to all that American hustle. But it can be too innocent. On the one hand, because the feasibility of the Chinese proposal today is negligible, as they also know, I believe.

And on the other hand, because the messages of the Bide administration, in their confusion, have something in common, which is for home, for the United States. One might therefore think that there is someone who intends to hybridize the conflict in Ukraine with the crisis in East Asia. And that the field is fertilizing.

If we don't have a device that spells out the occurrences of Xi Jinping, but at least those of us who have our eyes to explore the media somewhere, we read 13. That the last session of the AND has approved a series of modifications to the "Criminal Procedure Law on Military Forecasting in Wartime". It sounds like a fluke, right?