The work has been published in the journal Biology of Sex Differences. So far, only two studies (1,2) have investigated which toys the monkeys choose based on sex. Both concluded that males prefer toys considered “masculine” (like vehicles) and females prefer toys considered “feminine” (like dolls). However, these investigations were carried out with apes in their social groups, which makes it difficult to determine whether these differences reflect the real priorities of individuals or are conditioned by social dynamics.
In this study, 14 macaques (7 males and 7 females) were individually analyzed with different toys: “male” toys (vehicles), “female” toys (dolls), neutral toys (non-zoomorphic hard toys) and ambiguous toys (e.g. zoomorphic vehicles). The result was that both males and females preferred neutral and “masculine” toys. In fact, the biggest difference between the sexes was with the dolls: males played more than females.
These results are totally contrary to previous research. Researchers suggest that previously documented sex differences may be conditioned by context and question whether sexual differences between toy preferences have a biological basis.
Explanation Ana Galarraga in Hala Bedi irratia
Ana Galarraga spoke in Hala Bedi Irratia of the article written by Egoitz Etxebeste.
A father from Bilbao has asked me about the secondary education protocol being developed at the AMPA around mobiles.
As I read on the website of the Basque Government, in January 2024 there was talk in schools about the regulation of mobiles, that there will be no prohibition... [+]
Many years ago, Dr. I knew the abuse chatbot, and I also realized the speed at which people can engage with these machines. Being social animals, the relationship is natural and necessary, and as the name 'relationship' says, it always leads to a response from the other. Receiving... [+]
Wikipedia.org considers that Gish gallop (Gish's gallop) or the machine gun of fallacies "is a technique of controversy that attacks the opponent with as many arguments as possible, without taking into account the accuracy or solidity of those arguments" and would have as side... [+]
In the last year, it has happened to me to see people related to the non-professional realm in digital groups that have used artificial intelligence to give arguments to others. I share it as my own. One's own, but not linked to the sense of property, but processed from one's own... [+]