Petronor is the clearest example of this. It is often said to be the largest contributor to the Foral Treasury in Bizkaia. Lehendakari, Urkullu, and the Minister of Industry, Arantxa Tapia, visited the refinery on 16 June. A few days later, the Deputy General of Bizkaia, Unai Rementeria, presented the projects they plan to carry out with the President of Petronor. Therefore, the perfect harmony between the public-private.
In September of this year it has been stated that in the last year “Petronor has contributed an income of EUR 770 million to the Basque haciendas”, as is repeated in the media. But is that true? As Zubiri says, little or nothing.
These data have been extracted from the Petronor results accounts:
Therefore, beyond propaganda, the reality is that Petronor earns money with Corporation Tax (in this case, EUR 7 million), although he earns 135 million. And institutions give Petronor a lot more money (38 million) than the company pays in taxes (just 14 million local taxes).
When Petronor's contribution is mentioned, it is possible that what they think is the IRPF paid by the company's workers. Because taxes are not paid by the company, but by the workers. Tax revenues from the Mineral Oil Tax or VAT may also be increased in the accounts. These taxes are not paid by the company, but by ourselves every time we buy fuel for our vehicle. We can therefore say that Petronor pays little or nothing. Professor Zubiri's phrase is really correct.
We would like to know if Urkullu, Rementeria and those who echo the news are aware of this. It's incredible that you don't know, and it would be very serious. But even more serious is participation in the clean-up operation for companies, when they are not prepared to do anything for social welfare.
Another conclusion is that there is a very wide margin for companies to increase the taxes they pay for profits, especially in large corporations with tens and hundreds of millions of euros of profits. Petronor would pay taxes, but the regulations allow it to avoid it. And who does the regulation? The ones that appear in the photo with the heads of Petronor. Political power and economic power therefore agree that Petronor and other companies should not pay the profit tax.
To those who deny companies the possibility of raising taxes, we would ask them not to feel hypocritical, especially in the current situation, and to tell the truth. Do you think it is good that Petronor does not pay the tax even though it makes great profits? Well, let them tell you. But please do not say that this is not the right time to increase taxes on corporate profits, wealth, capital and high incomes. It is never a good opportunity; our authorities think that it is never advisable to lighten the pockets of the wealthiest.
The Atacama Desert Foundation has denounced on social networks the destruction of the geoglyphs of the area and, through several photographs, has shown the destruction that visitors who travel in 4x4 vehicles to the desert are causing. These are large geoglyphs made between 1000... [+]
One of the reasons for the investiture of Salvador Illa as president of the Generalitat has been the PSC-ERC pact. It is not a sovereign pact at all, but in some respects new doors could be opened, unless the political strategy of the PSC-PSOE, which is common, is re-imposed... [+]
In recent years, on a Monday in January, social and news networks remind us that it is the saddest day of the year in the hemisphere norte.Es Blue Monday, because in English the adjective blue means sad and sad. Commentators who have not found any other news to fill the new... [+]