On March 27, Daniel Raventós, a Catalan economist and president of the Spanish State of the Basic Income Network, was interviewed in the public arena. In this summary interview we translated what was said about basic income:
How does the Government view the idea of introducing basic income for a period of time and of charging people without income or low-income citizens who are unable to access approved aid?
"If people who are already in need have to pass the paperwork to check that they qualify for income, the measure loses effectiveness."
It will be up to the government to determine who is going to receive it, so this is a conditional income, which in theory will fall on the people most in need. It is incredible to make such a proposal, because people will have to prove that they are in a very difficult situation. And the speed of the measure is also important. If people who are already in need have to go through more or less lengthy procedures to check that they meet these conditions, the measure loses all its effectiveness. That is why we propose that all the people who believe that they need it should ask for it, and that within a maximum of a week the government should carry out small checks, and that everyone should receive the rent in the current account. And if there are people who have asked for it and think they didn't deserve it, because it's taken away from it in the 2021 income statement and it's already there. This has no technical problem.
How much money should the income have?
In accordance with the OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development in the Spanish Word Association) criteria, we propose that it be EUR 530 for a single household and half of it for each of the other members residing in the home. Living five people in a home costs more than living one, but it's not five times more expensive, because there are fixed costs. The OECD has put this meter in place, and we're also doing it very much, and it's approaching the poverty rate in homes. Under such special conditions as the present, we have determined how much is approaching what people need, and that need is accelerating day by day.
While the Basic Income Network calls for a stable measure, at this time they call for it to be maintained at least until the end of the year.
"The less that basic income lasts, the worse it will be."
The less this basic income lasts, the worse it will be. That is why I am symbolically defending the date of 31 December, because, among other things, the year is being taxed out and those who claim this income and do not deserve it because they will return it with the declaration of income. If this measure is highly conditioned and is very short in time, we're placing a bandage when you've been cut off your aorta. We are in a very special situation. The European Central Bank has also realised, and although the measures it has announced are insignificant, compared to 2008, 2009 and 2010, they are of a different nature.
The economic impact of confinement is enormous. How should the exit be? Is it an opportunity to rethink the current model?
"An economic policy must be made at the service of the majority. For example, that the property is in the service of public use"
There may be a rethinking, but as long as they do not materialise, they are just words. Remember that when the 2008-2009 crisis came, characters like Sarkozy said capitalism had to be recast. This only lasted as long as the states had to help the bank, then changed the discourse and it was said that we had lived beyond our possibilities. An economic policy must be made at the service of the majority of citizens. Concrete things, for example, that ownership is at the service of public use, as many republican constitutions have said throughout the twentieth century. The idea that private property is almost untouchable has led us to believe in the last 30 years, since the neoliberal revolution, but it's totally irrational. A Republican measure, which I hope will now be discussed more, is the maximum income, that is, that there should be more than a certain amount a positive marginal rate of 100%. Why? Because that person's wealth is contrary to the freedom of most citizens. Because it's obvious that the person who has a great fortune has a huge political impact, not just economic. The application of this general criterion enables concrete economic policies to be pursued.
Basically, it is a question of political will.
There is no economic policy measure that benefits all citizens.
Of course! That is what any economist, even right-wing economist, made clear a few decades ago: that economic policy is first political and then the economy. And politics means in which part of our citizenship we favour and in which we do not, and then we apply the economic technique that makes it possible. Because there is no economic policy measure that benefits all citizens, or that harms everyone.
Pandemiaren eragina indarkeria matxistan azterketa kaleratu berri du Espainiako Gobernuak. Bertan ondorioztatu dute eraildako emakume kopurua gutxitu egin dela, hauek kontrolatuta eduki dituzten denbora gehitu izanaren ondorioz. Baina emakumeen suizidioak gizonenak baino gehiago... [+]
Merkatura ateratzear den Hipra txertoari patenteak kendu diezazkiola eskatu diote hogei erakundek Espainiako Gobernuari. Izan ere, Kataluniako multinazional honek COVID-19aren aurkako txertoa egiteko entsegu klinikoetarako diru publikotik gutxienez 15 milioi euro jaso ditu.
Nafarroako Gobernuak bart gauerditik aurrera indargabetu ditu COVID-19aren aurkako neurri murriztaile gehienak. Kalean eta ikastetxeetako patioetan ez da derrigorrean maskararik erabili beharko, gaueko aisialdiak eta ostalaritzak pandemia aurreko ordutegiak berreskuratuko... [+]
"Osasun Sailaren immobilismoaren eta konponbide ezaren aurrean", otsailaren 25ean greba deitu dute lehen arretan ELA, SATSE, LAB, CCOO eta UGT sindikatuek eta otsailaren 28an Osakidetzako esparru guztietan. Horrez gain, otsailaren 26an manifestazioak egingo dituzte... [+]
Chop! There it comes again, I've felt in my chest early, this puncture is rare.
Chop! I've gently rubbed the part of my heart above the jersey. To see if it happens, I have already said it under, so no one can hear it. At present, care must be taken to control what you are going... [+]
La Bogue da Frantziako Limousin (okzitanieraz Limosin) eskualdeko hedabide alternatiboa. Kolektibo autonomo batek kudeatua, boluntarioek egina eta militantea, bere burua kokatzen du mugimendu anti-autoritarioaren baitan. Bertan agerturiko artikulua itzuli dugu euskarara.
“Proba bat egin ostean, COVID-19an positibo eman dut. Ondo nago, sintoma arinekin. Hurrengo egunetarako aurreikusitako agenda publikoa atzeratu eta konfinamendutik lanean segituko dut”. Kendu agenda publikoaren zera hori erditik, eta edonorenak izan zitezkeen... [+]
Igande eguerdian milaka lagun atera dira Donostia, Bilbo eta Gasteizko kaleetara gehiengo sindikalak deituta, kalitatezko osasun publikoaren alde eta Lehen Arreta jasaten ari den kolapsoaren aurka. Oso gogor mintzatu dira Iñigo Urkullu buru duen Jaurlaritza osasun... [+]
Osakidetzaren azken protokoloak dio positibo baten kontaktu estua izanagatik COVID-19a azken 180 egunetan pasatu duenak, txertatuta egon edo ez, ez duela etxean berrogeialdirik egin beharrik, baldin eta ez badauka sintomarik.
Txertoaren hirugarren dosia abian da herrialde aberatsetan eta laugarren dosia ere ezarriko zaie arrisku taldekoei. Denborarekin txertoek eragindako antigorputzak galdu egiten dira, eta horiek gehitzeko errefortzu dosiak jartzea da gobernuen estrategia. Baina txertoen alde... [+]
The way science becomes public policy is governed by political and economic calculations, as well as by the moral and ideological commitments of politicians, parties and advisers.” Sociologist Jana Bacevic said this in April 2020 at The Guardian.
We have all been able to see... [+]