How many women* crush in the hypermarket buying lettuce? And buying it in the village store? And buying on the market? What about the consumption group?

How many women* apartment bringing my parents to the nursing home? And hiring a caregiver for several hours? And with care shifts?

How many women* apartment every time I turn on the light of Iberdrola? What about Goiener on? What about solar panels on the roof? And the light off?

How many women* apartment purchasing clothes in Zara? And buying on the Internet? And buying it in the village store? And at the request of the modisto? And reusing someone else's?

It is clear that at present 0 oppressions cannot be achieved in many areas: for example, although everything is bought directly from farmers, the average annual wage of the horticulturists who own ecological land in the Basque Country is EUR 14,990. But even though it is not possible 0, there is always a need to influence more or less the number of women* in the elections themselves.

This article includes the asterisks of the woman*, in addition to the various forms of life of the gender, as well as the working men in situations of oppression. But I have used the word women* to show that women are the sectors most subdivided by sectors: of the 1.2 billion hungry people in the world, 70% are peasants and 70% are women and girls.

Of course, in that number of women* oppressing each of our actions would be included women who had been crushed in the country of origin*, the women who the exploitation of this product sent them from the territory*, those oppressed by the transport system on the way, those oppressed by the precarious conditions in the sales chain in our country... Perhaps then it would change the value of the terms "expensive" and "cheap", or open some other word for women who are oppressed for a product or service* from 0.

Our daily life would not be as "comfortable" and "cheap" as it is today. But every time we spend a thing or a service we use every day to tread on 0 women*, life would be more satisfying, dignified we have, the freest world. And I'm sure it consumes less CO2. The Climate Transition that the authorities talk about doesn't say anything about this, perhaps because in the new life that they want to bring us the number of women* that every single thing and every service is going to step on is going to be even bigger. We will have to do so by citizens, bringing together users of everything and oppressed women*, creating new forms and relationships of production and consumption.