The Baso Biziak platform has presented in the municipalities four types of motion in Gipuzkoa, Bizkaia and Araba: those that demand the prohibition of eucalyptus, those that establish the moratorium of eucalyptus, those that promote the purchase of land by the city council and the multiple that can be included in the general bag "others". Thanks to this initiative, eucalyptus plantations have been banned in the municipalities of Bergara, Antzuola, Itsasondo, Oiartzun, Oñati, Usurbil, Atxondo and Amurrio in the CAPV. The moratorium on eucalyptus has been approved in Zumaia, Ordizia, Legorreta, Ataun and Ikaztegieta. The municipalities of Hernani, Olaberria, Lazkao, Orendain and Baliarrain, Ea, Mañaria and Larrabetzu approved the purchase of land.
The municipalities that have denied the motions are: Eibar, Mutriku, Elgoibar, Busturia, Bermeo.
Baso Biziak states that "the generally accepted motions have fulfilled their role and in municipalities that have not approved monoculture has advanced without any obstacle, even planting eucalyptus". The neighbors and neighbors of Baso Biziak have highlighted the work they have had to do in the towns, maintaining the relationship with the city council and having "tensions" for the fulfillment of land purchases, prohibitions and moratoria: "Without popular pressures it is easier to look at other public institutions or eat the given word, so the citizens have again been, in collaboration with the city council, a guarantee of compliance with the signed".
The Baso Biziak platform currently consists of 18 groups and year after year, with the help of its members, have planted indigenous tree species: 17 hectares in the planting season of 2021-22, 5,800 trees of 18 species and in 2022-23, 26 hectares, 9,223 trees of 22 species.
They highlight that they do so in auzolan and that they are supported by local entities such as the Lurgaia Foundation, in most cases municipalities and in some cases by the Provincial Council. As well as other actors, associations, natural groups and local businesses.
Looking to the future, Baso Biziak will continue to promote another type of forestry: "We know that it is not easy to change inertias and forestalist interests so far, to introduce ourselves to the dynamics of living forests, but Nature itself, together with climate change, will set us in motion a profound reflection, limiting, rejecting obsolete criteria and techniques and prioritizing other values and ecosystem benefits for the whole of biodiversity."
The platform notes that territory is a "strategic capital for citizenship": "We cannot destroy it in the name of short-term private profits. We must make a clear commitment to make the territory a common good, with all the potential that this entails, and be clear that it is life insurance for future generations". That is why it requires public institutions "that responsibilities in the drafting of laws be subject to profit and public function, not to the private interest". They call for a "comprehensive redesign" of the agroforestry sector, proposing "extensive, close, green and sustainable models".
Baso Biziak highlights the importance of these criteria in protecting biodiversity. It proposes concrete measures for the transition to an autochthonous and biotic forest: regulating and reducing existing monocultures, avoiding new monoculture plantations and limiting and banning matarrase among tree extraction techniques. They also call for indigenous tree plantations to be prioritised and monoculture to be taxed "for the social and ecological costs they generate".
Local public entities call for compliance with the decisions they take in their forestry policies and for the implementation of the Government's Forestry Plan 1994-2030.
Baso Biziak platform proposes three levels of forest management:
On the one hand, forests for conservation, with ecosystem benefits for water, land, biodiversity, culture and leisure... These forests are natural corridors, green areas of ecological interest, other conservation figures...
On the other hand, the so-called "nearby productive forests". With native species, extensive biomass, fungi and value-added woods would be worked. Single-specific "limited" plantations are acceptable "combined with reduction, reuse and recycling".
Thirdly, edible forests and fruit trees are another kind of mass to consider as providing basic food.
The evaluation they presented in Elgeta can be seen in the following videos:
The dust has lifted the actions of a group of strangers against a Kutxabank monoculture in the Urola valley. In this regard, ENBE, ENBA and GBE (Gipuzkoako Basozale Elkartea) offered a press conference. They condemned the fact and called for the perpetrators to punish it.
After... [+]
In October 2022, the Balmaseda Mountains became a fireball, the most serious fire in the last 30 years, and the strong hot winds, summer drought and the third leg that is never mentioned, the monoculture of pines in the communal lands managed by the Provincial Council of... [+]