Companies want to avoid the Government of Spain in the processing of wind farms in Navarre
- Coordinadora Haize Berriak has denounced in the Ministry for the Ecological Transition and the Demographic Challenge the wind forests promoted by Sacyr Concessions, SLU, in the north of Pamplona, presenting this company as three projects which they consider unique.
The coordinator who works against the large wind farms that are intended to be built in their valleys and villages (Steribar, Erroibar, Ezkabarte, Anue, Olaibar, Txulapain, Berrioplano, Orkoien and Cendea de Olza) explained that the projects presented by Sacyr are one, Navarra 2 and Navarra 4, and not three.
Among the three, 29 wind turbines and 141.7 megawatts of power were added: “The three projects are located next to each other and continuously share ownership, evacuation line and electrical substation. The distribution in three projects is not based on technical criteria, but on state intervention at the time of processing, since projects with a power greater than 50 megawatts must be processed in the ministry and not in the autonomous community”.
The Ministry is requested to suspend immediately the administrative procedures being carried out before the Government of Navarra, until it is clarified who has the material and environmental competence for their processing and resolution. A copy of this complaint has also been submitted to the Government of Navarre for information: “We are awaiting the action of the Ministry and we know that it has asked the Foral Administration of Navarra to send it the material.”
Ensuring citizen participation
In addition, it has requested the Department of Industrial Management, Energy Infrastructures and Mines of the Government of Navarra to extend the 30-day period for public information.
According to the Coordinator, there are three reasons why no claims can be made to the projects within the allotted time: firstly, because of the complexity and length of the documentation submitted to the public, which contains documents, plans and technical elements that require a specialized and professional study.
Secondly, because the fact that the project is divided into three, triples the documentation and therefore makes it difficult to submit claims. Thirdly, public exposure during the months of August and September, precisely during the holiday period, does not provide contacts, requests reports from professionals or provides documentation.
They say that with this short term, the right to participate is impaired, “and the individual and collective possibility of citizens expressing their interests and demands is broken, in order to influence the decisions of the administration”.
According to Haize Berriak, the municipalities (Steribar, Valle de Erro), the councils (Enderitz, Otsakain, Orrio, Zildotz) and the associations of neighbours (Salvemos Egües, Urbi Auzo Elkartea), among others, have requested that the deadlines be extended.
In summer, we retirees don't tend to be hungry for vacations, and we can calmly analyze everything around us. Here are some issues that surprised me.
Spain. The Euro Cup and the Olympic Games are all over the summer. I have to say beforehand that professional sport... [+]
Conservative mentalities are afraid of the term planning, linking with progressive and even communist political currents, as the new authoritarianisms do today (Milei, Meono, Orban, Aznar, among others). However, the idea of planning is still in good health, at least formally... [+]
In recent times we have had in the media Aitor Uriarte, representative of the renewable energy company Solaria, to pay tribute to the benefits of the macro-projects they want to carry out. In the case of the appearance of Radio Euskadi on May 28, I felt a deep shame of the... [+]