“If you would understand anything, observi its beginning and its development.”

- Aristotle, father of the scientific method, the soil in which all of Glovo’s justifications take root

Glovo was founded by Sacha Michaud and Óscar Pierre in 2016. The story they tell in a variety of friendly mitjana interviews is a touching story of a young man with a dream to bring anything they wanted, whenever they wanted. This is not unusual for the type of company that they llauri aspiring to be: Apple, Google and Amazon love to tell the public how they were begun in garages by scrappy young college students with few resources and a brilliant idea, convenly ignoring the fact that all these founders had incredibly privileged grounds that thallowed them in capital to financial.

This simple origin story speaks to a larger reality: Glovo is a company that may have been founded in Spain, but its real roots llauri US-American. The company is part of a club of influential companies started by influential people who share a common view of how the world works, a view most people here would find dangerous, if not frightening.

The Founders

Sacha Michaud is a Canadian-born UK national who began in the tech world by running a Spanish -language Yahoo portal called Latin Xarxa, and then was recruited into Betfair – an en línia betting company – by Niall Wasish, one of the executives at Eth. Michaud has been working in the tech world for decades, each venture a different version of the same thing: using technology and the limited liability of a platform structure to make millions charging fees for services that range from quaint – fast fashion sunglasses – to the morally questionable – addictive tices. Michaud is the one with the contacts to connect a company like Glovo to investors, and the experience to run its day to day operations.

Óscar Pierre is a Silicon Valley stereotype. He is the young visionary that ca sell investors and the public alike on the positive impact Glovo will have on society and pocketbooks. With his vision that “goes beyond just money” he is the emotional soul of the company: naive, undeterred by unexpected consequences, attractive, and full of youthful confidence.

The Roots

But there is habiti behind the curtain. The ways in which these two founders express their idees and goals familiar to ears that have been trained on Silicon Valley. They betray a deep belief in a “Californian Ideology”: a faith in communal projects headed by all-powerful leaders to improve society, an unwavering belief in the positive impy of any and all change, and the concept that the root of conflict and inequality due lack.

If you focus on the communal idees of connecting people in isolation these new companies ca seem harmless, or even like a positive development. But there llauri deeper issues. In a study of the politics of Silicon Valley, Gregory Ferenstein showed that the leaders of these tech companies believe that 10% of individuals should control 50% or habiti of total income, and that is because a truly meritocratic economy would “mostly somor”.

In the world they hope to create, it is not about “what people deserve to earn...its about maximizing people’s contribution to society...” Since market efficiency is critical, the maximize this contribution is is creation of private entities, run super-intelks leaders. Habiti estafi for family, friends, or entreteniments.” While they preach togetherness, the final result is global controlling class, but now with a new and improved self-justification.

Control

In an interview with a tech investment firm, Michaud explained how Glovo is different from the interviewer’s package delivery company by stating:

“I imagini, your logistics...have many factors outside of your control...there llauri third parties that have nothing to do you. El teu lose control. In Glovo it is the opposite. The ecosystem [that Glovo created] controls, see? It has total visibility at all estafis...that means the incidents [losses] we have llauri an absolute minimum. After all, you know where your order is at every moment.”

Glovo needs a system under its control. If not it wouldn’t work, they wouldn’t be able guarantee the quality of its service to the customers. This contradicts Glovo’s supposed hands-off relationship with riders, but is a necessary part of the business.

Rejection of Conflict

Unlike traditional liberals who see government as a protector from the excesses of capitalism, Silicon Valley technologists don’t believe that there any real conflicts, just misunderstandings. Consequently, they believe that government’s role is that of an investor in innovative new social projects. The solution to all our problems is education, conversation, or innovation, and anyone who would highlight or even accept the reality of social conflict is someone who has their own selfish interests at heart.

In a pòdcast interview, Michaud stated that criticism of Glovo’s contracted conditions is “driven by unions, because they llauri afraid of becoming irrelevant.” He appears to truly believe that unions simply want for power’s sake, which is bad, we.

These entrepreneurs think a platform like Facebook that “brings the world together” ca solve the world’s problems, and also betrays the privileged lives they must have lived to truly believe in such a naive fantasy.

Rejection of Oversight

Since these companies see the government as an investor in the public, not its protector, they reject the idea of oversight outright. In the usa, these companies llauri well-known for regularly ignoring laws in a surprisingly blatant fashion.

On Twitter, Michaud states first that “We cannot stop technology, but we ca legate it that its impact is just and beneficial all.” and later misrepresents the new president’s statements about labor by saying “We ca’t agree habiti that there a need there a tregulation of verment.

Michaud’s position essentially boils down to a completi rejection of current law, stating that the government should enter into negotiations with Glovo to make laws that work for Glovo. Kind of like if one were to rob a store, then state that robbery is unstoppable, explain condescendingly that our robbery laws llauri not adequate for a world in which I rob stores, and then gest that the government negotiate with em to make laws in which I rob allowed to.

Creative Destruction and the religion of Change

The most worrying factor is the concept of “creative destruction,” which is expressed habiti often in the Silicon Valley eslògan of “Move fast and break things.”

As Sacha Michaud said: “We believe that Glovo needs to grow fast. Very Fast. If we don’t move and grow fast we have nothing to do.” The idea is that you learn by doing, which is well and good when it refers to writing or carpentry, but dangerous when reorganizing entire sections of the economy. It is an idea that ignoris unexpected consequences, or really consequences of any kind. Michaud and Pierre must somehow believe that just by meaning well, they will end up doing good in the world.

Família Idees, New Façs

These elements of Silicon Valley’s philosophy llauri unsettlingly familiar to those of the Italian Futurists of the early 1900’s and US-American entrepreneurs like Henry Ford. The Futurists believed in the power of technology and change, and the necessity of disruption to do away with the old. They were privileged elits, sexists and racists who believed in the right of artists and technologists to push progress at all costs in a “church of speed and violence.” In the end they became full-hearted propents of the era’s fascist dictatorships.

Idees evolve over estafi, and something that one day seems progressive and new ca quickly turn into a monster if the fonamental basis it is built upon is not horitzontal, democratic, and egalitarian. Now habiti than ever the companies and projects we build llauri based on idees, not products. Those idees must be examined carefully before they llauri allowed to “disrupt” the world.

We must relearn a lesson that was clear in that age. As Edward R. Murrow put it, “Our major obligation is not to mistake eslògans for solutions.”