"Migration? Jose Mari Esparza's text raised powders a few months ago. That was a long string, and I would also like to pull it out. I could give arguments to say that discourse is racist, but it's not my intention, there are many kinds of racism everywhere, and the "progressive" sectors here are not safe from that reality. As I say, but I would like to focus on something else. Because Esparza’s text has given me a central reflection on the responsibility and obligation of those who think and receive information.

Language creates thought and thought creates action. On the one hand, it makes me think about the responsibility of those of us who make our media beliefs public. Perhaps we have no responsibility, surely calling to account is a conservative and paternalistic exercise, and opinion is free, like the economy, free. Opinion is as free as this world full of slaves. We have become professional, perhaps legitimate, opinion leaders, but as a consequence (also) social networks and the media are full of opinion journalism, "democratization of information".

On the other hand, it must be borne in mind how the recipients of this high opinion manage this large amount of information. I would say that many times we are not prepared to make a sufficiently profound reflection. Sometimes we only repeat the official speech. At other times, when the information gathered does not fit our opinion, we deploy the poison in the networks without giving room for reflection.

We create friends and enemies from the readings of the viscera, and we want to convince those who see the world differently, as if our only truth were ours.

Convinced that we are very political, that we are changing the world, we follow the path of distraction panem et circenses, while those who mark the agenda laugh with our cruelty.

We should ask ourselves what our mental process is to internalize information. The beliefs we have in our heads are not many times ours, but a consequence of fear and prejudice, in short, what others want us to think. Remembering Aristotle, we are political zoons, "political animals." So, I would say that being a "political animal" is understanding the other deeply, and so understanding the world. With this action we should each purge their own trigger so as not to throw it into the world.