Why in school is it more important to know the periodic table than to know how to mount a plug? Why do we only learn the prestigious in school? And why is what you learn in school more prestigious than what you learn outside?
How can you take a young man out of school by stitching a button, painting walls or repairing a bicycle? Wasn't the school base preparing for a good life? And are they not necessary to live well?
Why don't we see it, that only the fate of a gray life is what we are offering to children and young people? Are we not aware that school is the training needed to support the neurotic society?
Why is the gap between the learning set we need for life and what we need to succeed in school so wide?
Why is a student with school knowledge considered more intelligent than another?
"Why is the gap between the learning set we need for life and what we need to succeed in school so wide?"
Why is the importance and time devoted to the workforce reduced year after year? Why is intellectual knowledge so premium? Why does the working world have no place in school? Why don't we see students building shelving, for example, in Vocational Training? Why do we think they have failed?
Why is knowledge divided into subjects if in life it does not work that way to learn? Why do we not want life situations to be stimulating in the context and starting point of integral learning? Why do we think that organizing a trip can't be enough to study geography, mathematics, history, biology? Why do we turn learning so boring, cold, distant and abstract?
Why do we naturalize young people having to stay in school for at least eight years and about 30 hours a week? Why should the school be the organizer of most children's vital experiences? Why do we think it so important that children learn quickly to function on the basis of interests that are not theirs?
Why do they call it an educational system and not a learning system? So what is the goal, whether children learn or teach us?
Why do we design the curriculum that we all need to learn at the same time? Why do we need to determine when a child will be curious about something? Why do we do it, knowing that what they want and not do at the moment when they want to turn off the urge to learn? Why do we prefer that children get good grades than learning? Why do we pay the expensive price of failing to keep pace with students and sacrificing personalized care?
Why are we afraid that children don't learn the necessary things? If you can live without learning, is that really necessary? Why should we learn what does not meet our real need? Why is it different to us and to the power system?
Why have we normalized the desire to learn from children and the substitution of natural pleasure for deferred notes? Why have we recognized the qualification of people and also be the defining of failure or success? Why do we believe that solidarity can take place in such an intrinsic organisation as competition and hierarchy?
Why do we classify children by age? What other natural communities?
Why do we not perceive in the same arrangement of the classrooms the disciplinary will of the educational institutions?
Why...? (Add question)