“Beware, we’re on a protected schedule!” “I don’t know if this can be said…” “Forgive, it’s been unintentionally…” I see them back to the table, spying on the words of the previous one, if you are not going to escape some barbarism like “fool”, “ass”, “nipple”, “torcaz” or “tampon”. I imagine them in the style of Monty Python, without “Jehovah!”, surprising who said “fuck!”.

“Tell us what’s new in the case of Urbia.” Then a fellow passes. Women and children killed, beaten, fragmented, spread, parties as if they were sacked. It counts everything to the last morbid detail.

Banning raw words for ethical and aesthetic issues can be debatable, but using the childhood social group as an excuse, anyone would say it is no more hypocritical. Minimum.

A few years ago, I was able to see how an American chain pixelated the mosaics of Pompeii and the ladies of Avignon de Picasso. They seem to be too scandalous. More and more parts of the body and images found in normal situations and positions are being pixelated, erased and hidden, while misogynistic and savage pornography spreads indefinitely.

It's really hypocritical, because the same people who are dedicated to the former take money out of the latter.

All these hypocrisy are clothed in puritanism. We could say that this superficial puritanism is used to cover up despicable behaviors, to give a certain layer of honesty. But it goes further.

The separation of women between Santa and Comadron has historically been a fundamental piece for the system. Both are the main roles expected of women: the caregiver and the whore. Men, who, in order to be men, have to covet and win, just like any other heritage.

Women have been wearing these very tight suits for a long time. The sexual liberation that began in the 1960s had a lot to do with it. But let us remember that this sexual liberation came to free the pleasure and desire of women, not to facilitate the path to the pleasures and desires of men. The second is the same cage, but with less clothing. This fine line separates the subject from the object and not from the actions themselves.

If we analyze the rise of puritanism in these terms, we could say that the framework could be an attempt to reverse. Women's bodies are dirty. This is conditio sine qua non for the consumption of female bodies. The desire of the hidden is greater in itself. But also, what better than a corset to convince us that we have to get rid of that corset? Hypersexualization would not work as well today, unless a line of puritanism had been extended with it.

What we do is never free from what we have decided. The context and the underlying forces must be considered. To analyze the conducts themselves and accept the contradictions. Do whatever you want with your body, but don't sell me as a feminist act among Christmas grapes.

The music we listen to is not the music we have chosen to listen to, but the music we have been pushed hard by our ears. If not, find out what has happened to the song that Spain has to bring to Eurovision. The people chose to send the subjects of the marshes, as well as to denounce the puritanism mentioned, but the prescribers decided to send the representation of the object of the marshes.

We're a big business moving a lot of dollars. Funny videos and book prostitution with the army, on a next occasion.