"Communication is said to be fiction, unlike interpretation itself. They say that fiction is true, unlike what is false. It's said that reality is fiction, unlike fiction itself." A. Alieva

They line up by couples as copulative associations. However, contrary to what has given you to your ear, dvandvas are not exotic animals. They say that we have domesticated them with Sanscritic for a long time, which means “partner” in the étimo, and they are dedicated to splashing in sight. In any case, they're far from human genealogy: they're not beast animals like us.

They say that the key is to have the same category and, following the advice of the experts, they are quite fertile if they are properly combined: to the left, to the right, to the right, to the left, to the right, to the left, to the left, to the left, to the left, to the right, to the left, to the left, to the right, to the left, to the left, to the front, to the black and white, to the back, to the woman, to the woman, to the woman, to the woman, to the woman, to the woman, to the dvands is to the plural, but it is actually a plural character, but it is a relationship between two. In addition, despite the protest of the mutual examples that you have chained, we must regard them as of the same standard.

Although it also includes an example in Euskera, Wikipedia in French has somehow saved it from chaos: forment une énumerration virtuelle. The dvandvas are virtual. Ear, suitable for a chorus.