Architects, economists, sociologists and other disciplines have revolved around the question “how should the city we want be?”, recognizing that interdisciplinarity is the fundamental basis for making the city. It has become clear that the future of cities must act on the resilience of climate change, the rehabilitation of neighborhoods, the creation of a decent housing park, the mobility model, the right to public space, the guarantee of equality and health. They are all a high degree of complexity and a lot of problems that cross, and they have all unanimously accepted the character and new dimension of the challenges of the future, which the urban recipes used so far do not serve. The concept of city is in crisis.

It highlights the number of deaths and illnesses caused by cities and the number of situations of inequality they cause. Because architects are fond of building wood buildings, local resources and reused materials, and working to make the streets greener, because of their technique and aesthetics, but it is more uncomfortable for us to think about the appropriate urban systems to care for and deal with the affairs of the elderly, arguing that it is the function of others. The city is a transformative political instrument, whether it likes it or not, and the role of the architect is as essential as necessary in this social construction, if he is trained to think in a broad letter, for every living being.