In the same article that I wrote here in March on this subject, I was talking about the fact that sentimental dissent should begin with suppressing the affective centrality of partner relationships. Perhaps from the evidence of what I was saying to them, I was surprised that people did not feel more challenged, but that was the conclusion that I drew from some feedback that was passed on to me by the readers: people believe that the romantic ideology that idealizes the form of a couple, that at least does not affect us progressive and (post)modern people like us, and that it is no longer the antiquated principles of affective life our drivers.
This perception is erroneous, but the existence of a hierarchy of affections in which all the privileges of the partner institution have been made so invisible to us. What have we already emancipated ourselves? Let's see:
Why don't we imagine projects like long-term coexistence, buying a home, choosing a shared economy, paternity or educating children?
Why do we think it is normal that in the workplace there should be no days of leave to take care of a friend, but that he can have it, for example, for the care of a brother-in-law who never sees, simply because he is an affective orbiting satellite of a formalized partner?
Why do we measure both the declarations of love through the words, as if we had to be careful, if we tell the right person? Don't we know that these words have the function of expressing true love, and that we ourselves give real love a concrete and narrow form monopolized by idyllic love Disney?
If the couple is not the supreme form of love, and the rest of the bonds are not just a complement or a consolation prize, how can we explain the phrase “we are just friends”, the formula we use when we want to express with someone who has no affective-sexual relationship?
Etc. etc.
"Like the other hegemonic institutions, we have also sought alternatives to the romantic model of couples, but not always in the right direction"
Like the other hegemonic institutions, it has also been attempted to seek alternatives to the romantic model of the couple, but not always in the right direction. Today, for example, fleeing from the dependence generated by an excessively strict and square way of understanding the couple, we have jumped to an absolute personal independence that can only be believed in the logic of a capitalist market, in which we have so much protected and protected our individuality and our freedom, which has de facto become impossible to us, the same possibility of having a meaningful relationship with other people.
More interesting alternatives such as polymerization consider the need to understand and expand the network beyond the peer as the first condition of the affection revolution. But be careful to read these proposals in neoliberal coordinates, because relationships with people can never be understood in the sense of increased consumerism. At least, if we do not want to pay the expensive price of the distribution of love or the dehumanization of affections, or if we want to avoid the cold of loneliness and affective starvation, let it be the sad fatality of those of us who have decided to love out of the usual affective formats.
The real alternative to conventional love is the creation of more community networks in which, far from labels, we recognize and will show all lovers their value and uniqueness as the axis of all relationships, establishing friendship, and guaranteeing mutual affective commitments and an ethics of rigorous relations, the label of quality of our love.
Bidali zure iritzi artikuluak iritzia@argia.eus helbide elektronikora
ARGIAk ez du zertan bat etorri artikuluen edukiarekin. Idatzien gehienezko luzera 4.500 karakterekoa da (espazioak barne). Idazkera aldetik gutxieneko zuzentasun bat beharrezkoa da: batetik, ARGIAk ezin du hartu zuzenketa sakona egiteko lanik; bestetik, egitekotan edukia nahi gabe aldatzeko arriskua dago. ARGIAk azaleko zuzenketak edo moldaketak egingo dizkie artikuluei, behar izanez gero.
There are those who, being a brilliant brain, with definitions of "little detail," are experts in transforming and transforming the same thing, in other words. It was yours and it has been a project in eternum that has been repeated for decades. This was one of the main reasons to... [+]
On 26 December, during an air strike, the Israeli Army killed five Palestinian journalists trying to reach the city. They killed 130 Palestinian journalists. This news has reminded me of a couple of things, the first, the persecution of true journalists in any part of the world,... [+]
In recent months I have had to work in a number of institutes and, at some point, I have had to talk to the students about the possibilities offered by the labour market. The typology of the students is varied and in the same city varies a lot from one neighborhood to another,... [+]
The girl who appears in the center of photography, which can hardly be considered historical, is writing a list of adjectives: I, you, he, we, you, they. Looking down, I couldn't see what his gaze looked like.
Insensitive to the work of the photographer, you, slowly and... [+]
When you work with older people or people with physical and neural diversity, you realize that the idea of competition in our society limits us a lot as a species. That is, our system puts you in value by doing things specifically, and what it doesn't do is incapable of the... [+]
I wanted to write for the Christmas lights and claim to become an annual tradition in this time of street lighting, a welcoming, joyful and joyful public space from the point of view of the class. But, of course, also warm public spaces where some young people can be warming up... [+]
He forgives the oak trees, oak trees, oaks, herons, strawberries, dressings, chestnuts, birch, gorostidias, chamomiles, pine trees and all the societies of the trees, but today the hayedo has a date on the occasion of the celebrations of the winter border.
It is easier for me... [+]
Euskaraldia comes back. Apparently, it will be in the spring of next year. They have already presented it and the truth is that it has surprised me; not Euskaraldia himself, but his motto: We'll do it by moving around.
The first time I have read or heard it, the title of the... [+]
When the heteropatriarchal capitalist colonial system is questioned and fought, it attacks mercilessly. Using all the tools at your disposal to strengthen, strengthen and consolidate institutional power, media, justice, language, culture, violence...
In Switzerland, where every... [+]
I do not know if you also have the same perception – I recognise this: here I have started to write in a scientific way. I am referring to the natural extension of the word laziness. I hear more and more in the corners of Hego Euskal Herria: Basque, Spanish and, of course,... [+]
Many at Christmas feel more lazy than illusion when we think about meals and family gatherings. But we anticipate that it is not food that makes us feel collectively uncomfortable, but the normativity that defines the traditional family. Moreover, we would dare to say that the... [+]
I have always found the way in Spanish to the carriages that can be found here and there: humiliating. Isn't it a pretty light, white name or doesn't it have any connotation? After all, everything that was going on there had to be humiliated. It is known that for the god of... [+]
The end of the Syrian Arab Republic has caused great surprise at the way in which it has taken place: fast and almost without resistance. However, it is not so strange when we consider that the country was destroyed, impoverished and trodden. Most Syrians have long been... [+]