And z I'll write by ETB. So as not to bother anyone, I'm going to write with a canon. The first thing I say is that it's not a kind of boat. But I do not think it is easy, because when you talk about canon, someone in the Basque cultural ecosystem is always angry, because they have not put him in the hierarchy or because they have put him in, but angry. And forgive me for writing everything in lowercase.

Canon is a rule, but also something else. I remember Greece and its way of measuring. It can also be summarized in the category. The canon is the hierarchy. That means there are some up and some down. Experts also write about the characteristics of the canon. Write and write. This, after all, means nothing more than a way of understanding the cultural world, the world. In other words, some have category and others do not. Another thing is what the category is. There is no room for it in this column. What is clear is that the measures of the canon vary according to the times, that is, they are not the same, one century or the other.

In view of the above, it seems to me that the canon of our culture is even more linked to the 19th century than XXI.ari. Because in our canon, it's clear who's up there. Some living writers, at most two or three, some dead sculptors, even two or three, and some painters. This is the high level of the canon of our culture. That's what medically pushes and gives prestige. It's hard to imagine that an artist from another field is part of that Parnaso. And musicians, actors, photographers, sad poets, singers, dancers, cartoonists, designers, sound engineers, bertsolaris, scriptwriters -- all of them are part of the hierarchy but they don't come within the limits of the canon. For example, you completely idiot. If Atxaga were given the Nobel, I'm sure Iñigo Urkullu would be Oslo, but if Telmo ESNAL were given the Oscar, which is where we are born for many, in Los Angeles not.

They forget that, closer to Los Angeles than to Bilbao, there was a guy we're all used to today in the canon. Andy Wharlol. It created the concept of pop culture. It comes from popular pop, that is, from the lowest level of the hierarchy. And it's been a long time since this broke the canon rules. But somewhere among us some people don't want to take it into account.

I see myself among those who make that pop art, and I don't care whether I'm part of the canon or not. But I have no doubt that I am part of the culture. So I feel like a little expert, I'm a little expert. And in Euskera, I also fully agree with the other sense that pop has. After all, we are at the last place in the hierarchy: the stern.