The last one I wrote for ARGIA, being about the Film Festival, was easy, although I wrote about the independence of our film. Although this time it would have been easy, with DSS2016. There's the Katebegiak project. I do not know very well which chains are going to form those links, but the title is very pompous, as the official propaganda would say, very much in line with the objectives of the project. What is true is that everything that is done this year in Donostia-San Sebastian, in the field of culture, coincides with these objectives, and if it were not, it would come. But I'm not going to write about capital, but about ETB. Because, even if it sounds like a lie, ETB still exists.

I have received a message announcing the new Beti eskamak kentzen series. Nice, elegant and well made. I sincerely hope that it will go well, even if that does not provide any guarantee. We have as an example the house of the Father. It was well done but it has not continued. And so, the more, in recent years. The position of our public chain is the same as that of the Spanish generalists: the hearings are mandated. If there is no hearing that they request it beforehand, then Marianton! According to what do you ask for the rating? I would say that it is closer to desire than to reality. Reality puts us closer to the void than the number marked by desires. Surely, if the unfortunate Beti eskamak fail, they are already preparing the substitute at ETB. And so one, and another, and -- how long?

I do not want to mention the debate on the objectives that ETB should have. The issue of the obligation of a public television rarely appears in the Basque media. I think no one is interested. It seems that we have admitted that ETB has no solution, that we have a responsibility to do nothing, as if it were a matter of fate, something that is irremediable. I wonder, what do other parties that are not the PNV do on the EITB Board of Directors? What is discussed in their meetings, in addition to the expulsion of workers?

It has been many years since the structure of public television was invented. Can we not question our television model and think that it can be done differently when the transition itself in Spain is questioned? I think so. Do we need four chains, so many workers, a giant residence? What is the budget spent on? In the contents or simply in the maintenance of the structure? It's a long list of questions. But it doesn't matter, ETB is at its peak, like it's hidden, like there's no awkward controversy from time to time. Just like it emerged around the emission of windows to look inside. The President then left the square with impossible excuses. I am at least admitted that the disproportion of responsibilities is terrible.