Reflection is a daily journey, today more than yesterday, as the past does not have to limit the way. So, by the way and by the way, by the two paths, let's think. It is often the case that what was achieved in the mid-term is not what was thought of at the starting point. What sustenance! The best way to reduce them is to widen the conception, feet in the present and head in the future, effectively uniting the forecasts and later visions. Because ineffectiveness doesn't create the conditions for change. In a world of dynamic nature and biodiversity, the action of leftist sovereigns here needs it, because at all times it is necessary to be well positioned to activate the social majority that the changes need.

The latest election date has left a four-year framework in several CAV institutions. There are things to rethink so that next time they become a good sample of surprises. We must demystify once and for all, with my thought, some of the axes that we bring from the past. From left to right and abertzale to abertzale, for example. Those that in the past led to the confrontation of projects do not fulfil this function in the present, since the old simple does not have a fundamental place in the current complex. Our project cannot be the same as it was then. Systemic crisis.

So we have had grey surprises in the traditional territories of nationalism, more fruitful in the other Basque territories. Surely because of the different pedagogy of their tours. Acquisition of a lesson. We need a more inclusive concept of sovereignty, which can be integrated by a social majority, that in a globalised world the Basques manage the internal and external responsibilities of our territory. In this direction, the Broad Front should be a useful alternative if it were invented in the forms of metamorphosis, to do and to act. On the front, we need more sociology experts than we need in law, even if there is a need for everyone.

In fact, the axis of today's project confrontation is the way to understand and materialize the socio-political culture. Therefore, in addition to the fact that the new political formations that have been created are in addition to collaboration, the question we must answer is why today’s project is not attractive to those people in left-wing sovereigns. Why? Perhaps because in this historical era of new paradigms the inertia of the past and vocabulary is too heavy, even more so to extend it with traditional pedagogy. Well, the next time you tell us that the results won't surprise us!