argia.eus
INPRIMATU
Who and how did Moctezuma II kill?
Nagore Irazustabarrena Uranga @irazustabarrena 2012ko otsailaren 21
Moctezuma II.a azteken enperadorea 1520ko ekainean hil zuten, baina ez dakigu zehazki nola.
Moctezuma II.a azteken enperadorea 1520ko ekainean hil zuten, baina ez dakigu zehazki nola.

Tenochtitlán, current Mexico City, June 29, 1520. Aztek's emperor, Moctezuma II, died, possibly, from a stone in his head, or wounded by the sword or arrow by the Aztecs or perhaps by conquerors.

Until the time of death comes a historiography, more or less. Since the entry of Hernán Cortés into the capital of the Empire in November 1519, the relations between the emperor and the Spaniards were apparently peaceful, mainly because the Moctezum was subjected to all the conquerors’ pretensions. But when Cortés discovered the treasure kept by Moctezuma, his intentions changed. On the pretext of a tax dispute, Cortés arrested the emperor in his palace. Another version says that during the absence of Cortés, Alvarado's substitute killed about 1,000 noble Aztecs. The Aztecs rose up and then decided to abduct the Moctezum.
The fact is that, in the midst of the rebellion of the Aztecs, the emperor went out to the balcony – or to the roof – of the palace, to alleviate the indignation of the population. According to chronicler Bernal Díaz del Castillo (1496-1584), Moctezuma went out on his own to address the citizens, who attacked him with stones, believing that the emperor had been sold. He died as a result of one of these stones, and the Spaniards were particularly attracted by the appreciation they deserved to the Moctezum, a source that does not mention the treasure.

The Franciscan Bernardino de Sahagun (1499-1590), for his part, collected the Spanish version and the Aztec sources. The chronicle of the Sahrawi people speaks of the golden hunger of the Spaniards. He says that in addition to the stones, the rebel citizens also shot him arrows. But he points out that Moctezuma's body had sword wounds, which would make the Spaniards guilty.

Most historians claim that the moctezum was “upon request” from Cortés to speak to the citizens, and that it was murdered by rebel citizens against the Spaniards. But in 2003, American historian Matthew Restall opted for the Aztec version of sources; according to his hypothesis, Moctezuma did not die from attacks by Aztec citizens, and the Spaniards, seeing that the attempt to stop the rebels with their words failed and that from then on they no longer needed anything else, decided to kill Moctezuma with his sword.

Surely we will never know who and how he killed the emperor. However, it is quite clear what condemned the emperor. And the empire.