We herrot the days of strikes to denounce the viscous reform of the retorts. At the end of the mass demonstrations, the speakers at the Town Hall Square in Bayonne set us the following date, with a series of murmurs raging on the margins: why is it worth losing one’s salary in an occasional movement, which would be enough to carry out an indefinite strike of one week? Stop the trains, the trucks, the subways, the schools, the posts, the private factories, let's paralyze this country with the government that has no respect for the most discerning citizen.

The tax booths that Herresteria takes advantage of will be destroyed. They won't touch the tapestry that's in the best interest of the rich. Although Fillon has just said that this is not a taboo subject, Sarkozy insists that it is not possible to have a president who will issue taxes (of course for wealthy bakers). Taxation is therefore a guarantee of fundamental injustices, both in works and in speeches. Same thing with retrets. Especially for the wives of those who have been working indifferently of children, remembering that during their entire working life they also snoop 20% lower than men. It's his wife's economic independence questioning him. We can lose, because this is not one of the unrecognized goals of this reform to reorganize the white patriarchal society. Wives like the emigrant Alain – witnesses to the hysteria against the Romas of the summer rulers – are sober in the workplaces. Especially in low-level tasks. In the shortest months.

We are told that the system of retreats is to be saved, but the very power of retreat at an acceptable age is ultimately denied to our generations and posterity by change. I believe that the reform has a twofold objective: one, to open the way to private companies that offer capitalized portrayal – most of the leaders are friends of the presidents – and two, to incinerate a world of work that has so far been subdivided into divisions and different drinkers. Twenty years ago, the neoliberals declared a silent war to the detriment of work.

He begins to think kindly and it is clear that in the way they say to save in the retret, work with adequate qualities and salaries could be the way out. Haboro contributors may be required for social security, retraction or health care. The ruling elite is not in this: the state is going backwards in multiple public spheres and the ruling class does not want to impose a lot of sos in solidarity structures. Laurence Parisot, director of MEDEF, does not proclaim anything else.

They encourage us to sacrifice. We are closer to the concerns of the wide mouths of the

CAC 40 than to the indignation of the homeless beggar. They've managed to besiege our brains. That is why it is so difficult to fight and squander a day of strikes, even if it is for the rights of the citizens. The unions have announced Saturday’s actions to recruit workers without sufficient resources. Is the strike simply a problem of economic resources? Like when buying a new car or an HD ready TV screen? If we hope to accumulate resources to go on strike, the time of aiding many will be long. As long as they do what they enjoy about us and in the sand we Europeans would be pauperized with respect to the salaries of the most common Chinese.

The miners of Emile Zola’s terrible novel Germinal did not have the means to go on strike when they left their jobs under the leadership of Etienne Lantie. They didn't win that bitter December, but something changed in them.