Before the elections, it was a motto on everyone’s lips: "We have to put care in the center," he added. Apart from the curious and incorrect statements made by politicians and politicians, I must admit that for a while the subject was at its peak. Both parties and various associations endeavoured to assert the need to give more importance to care.

The elections passed and, as always, went to a "territory" of things not filled with care; I think it has to be a kind of limbo, and it has to be overwhelmed, if not indefinite.

I have considered that doing this on the part of all politicians is normal in politics; the component of corrupt democracies: they promise thousands of things in the elections, and then they do not fill any. Unfortunately, many people now accept this drift, because it is the result of which the parties remain. "No lies, no democracy," changed the old motto. Be it.

Another thing and what I cannot understand (but what I have to recognize as above) is the silence of the associations that today are around care. If it is not only that the election time is the right time to make demands, I cannot understand or accept that attitude. Someone has to explain the reason, if there is a valid reason.

The point is that care (poor state of care in the public sector) is as important as before the elections, that the deficit is huge and that it remains. Institutions (parties, therefore) have long ceased to spend (more) money (on investment) on people’s real needs. In the case of care, this means that older people and their families cannot receive (receive nothing) to cope as much as possible with the deficiencies, springs and illnesses they suffer or, at least, to receive adequate protection and care. As everyone said, it is a right of all, it is not a service that the institutions (parties) provide for their generosity. After complying with the thousands of papers, appointments, petitions (and the time they spend on it) asked by the elderly and their families, they receive the negative. It seems that the money that is there is being used up in paying the salary to the thousands of types that are dedicated to these services. Ah, even in some embossing ads.

Given that older people and their families need care, they only have one option: to turn to the private sector and spend the money that this entails. This option is like creating a river. That is, all the waters that have fallen the rain inevitably go to a river, and so the river increases and increases, the flow is usually more abundant. The "flow" mentioned in the metaphor is a amount of money that goes (sends) from the public sector to the private sector. To see who tells me that's a lie. It is false that politicians have decided to starve the public part to fatten the private part (its green area).

There are many complaints against this, because there are many people who believe that what has just been mentioned is true.

But — and we will have to turn it into a political law — after the elections they are all silent, because although the problem remains as it is, it is no longer the time to ask for anything and, much less, to achieve it.

So with our silence, the flow of the private river increases and increases.

So when politicians are no longer politicians, they're fishing in the flow of this private river. Oh my God!

Finally, those who clearly state the perversity of the situation of two people.

A foreign woman is hospitalized. When she leaves the hospital she doesn't have where to go. Given the first step on the street, he is totally unprotected; he has nothing. Who can help you? Who will help you ask for and get help?

An old man spends his life sitting on a chair, but apparently he has no illness, so he has no choice to get help. With a lot of full papers, he replied that he did not submit enough documents stating that he is ill (because he suffers from several diseases) and that he can only receive the minimum (really the minimum) that he must be given to ensure the proper use of the money there is.

In both cases, the scholar himself is: There he, Marianton!

In both cases the situation is the same; to do something against it and (above all) not to do so is the same result, liberal political (also inappropriate to the metaphor!). Because we let the yawns do whatever they want. Because they say there are times (and inopportune times) to denounce and denounce aloud.

Those who have no other value than justifying ourselves and giving us the opportunity to live quieter.

Maru