Is it utopia to demand that linguistic rights be guaranteed for all Navarros?

We know that the issue is very difficult and complicated, as the management of languages is always a political issue at the root.

We agree with Eusko Ikaskuntza on this: the management of the Basque Country becomes a problem, among other things, because under there is a conflict between the national identities of the Navarros.

Is there any way of bringing this conflict to a democratic path?

Spain is nothing more than a fictitious democracy. In Franco it has strong roots in all its infrastructures, which remain intense. This is very clear in Navarre.

A healthy democracy does not suppress the most basic rights of its peoples. On the contrary, Spanish “democracy” systematically oppresses them in search of linguistic uniformity in Spain.

Here there is no conflict between two groups of societies that are not understood: Also in Navarre, the Spanish agents are carrying out a planned initiative to definitively eliminate the Basque country, to destroy the body of the Basques.

The Navarro Vascoparlante has no problem in the region of Pamplona or in the public institutions and services of the Mountain of Navarra by its language. Basque Navarros, for their part, face many difficulties if they are committed in Basque. The central administration of Navarre is in Pamplona, and since all Navarros have to go to that administration, it should respect and guarantee the linguistic rights of all Navarros. Linguistic and political measures are needed to reverse this obvious discrimination.

The Euskara article and trust in Navarre addressed the work of the Euskarafobos agents with a “neutral” view, limiting the exclusion of the Basques to the scope of perceptions (a group of indignados…) and without making any mention of the planned process of substitution of the Basque, let alone the drivers of this process.

We know that this is a very difficult issue. Because we are well aware of the situation in Navarre by area. But in another area, if two-thirds of society are male and female, should we reject the aspiration of a feminist and non-racial society?

In a strong democracy, are the numbers above human rights?

That is why we read with great concern the article of Eusko Ikaskuntza. "Things are like this, and that's what we have to manage," it says without proposing measures to change this unjust and unjust situation. This attitude leads us inexorably to perpetuate the current status quo and, by putting current reality as a standard, illuminating and ceiling, to ignore all injustices and oppression, in the name of consensus ... Consensus as the axis to perpetuate the current sad situation?

Also in the answer recently published by Eusko Ikaskuntza, the “indignados” are again cited and we are told that not all Basques have this perception that “the indignados”… Thank you, but we also know. It is something that happens in all marginalized groups. There will always be a larger or smaller group that is unaware of their situation or considers it normal, but that does not mean that we have no legitimacy to fight those of us who are aware of the situation. In any case, without indignation, we would like to have an Eusko Ikaskuntza by our side, in defence of the Basque citizenship.