In 2017, the Deputy authorities provided the dioxin expert, Josep Rivera, who said that if they followed closely, the dioxins did not cause harm, but he did not clarify the cost of this operation, but he would not live alongside an incinerator. Portzierto talks about partial closure by the dumping of dioxins in the incinerator in Barcelona. A little later, in 2017, Fernando Palacios and Eduardo Rodríguez Far discovered 12 toxic substances that were not included in the integrated environmental authorization. This year the Gurasos association, contradicting what was said by the authorities of the member in 2016, has made it clear that the measurement of emissions of dioxins and heavy metals will not be continuous, so the question is why Josep Rivera was brought by the members. to laugh at us? A month ago, Abel Arkenbout, a member of Toxico Watch, refuting the information provided by the authorities of the Member, said that if incinerators exceed the limit established by law, they cannot stay in half an hour, as it takes six weeks. In any case, I think it is more serious to know that in the case of incinerators the law is behind scientific research. In this context, F. is normal. Palacios and Eduardo R. Far's discovery of these new toxic substances. Finally, J. Unlike what Rivera did not do at the time, Abel Arkenbout talked about caressing in order to reduce maximum pollution.

For all that said, the implementation of the incinerator with the current conditions is a tremendous irresponsibility, so the implementation of a plan drawn up by Gurasos, respectful of the principle of health prevention, must be urgent.

In conclusion, I would like to recall the following statement: under the slogan No to incineration, on 11 May, at 6 p.m., it will take place in the Okendo de Lasarte square. Cheer!