Maria Chivite, similarly over Esparza, in the face of the screams of her enthusiastic followers (“No with Esparza!”). Can you trust Chivite's words? Chivite is not Sánchez and has not managed to be the first force in history, despite the recovery he has suffered. Navarrasuma has taken a big difference, and only with GB, Podemos and I-E will be able to get the majority if Chivite dissociates from EH Bildu. It's hard, harder than Sanchez, to reach one-off deals on topics playing from left to right. It would have to achieve a stronger pact with its potential Navarros left colleagues, as well as the abstention of EH Bildu. Chivite’s insistence does not herald anything good.

Chivite has a thin stem, also enviable, but stiff like a black one, to lean to the left. It cannot understand that in Navarre the left and the progressives should not only maintain socio-economic issues, but also cultural issues (including the Basque Country) if they want to create an inclusive democratic climate. Chivite’s cultural vision, particularly with regard to the linguistic richness of Navarre, is closer to the discourse of UPN than to its potential partners. To insist on the understanding of the demands for this wealth as a matter of identity, and not as a democratic issue, is not integrative. And keeping this harsh vision is to give up the plurality of Navarros' ideas. If it were for Chivite, the PSN would gladly receive the votes of Navarrasuma in order to win the presidency.

Let us hope, then, that we will have to thank Esparza for the fact that the PSN-UPN-C’s coalition of government, visible or shadow, will not take place.